Courseiva
Data Store Management →mediumMultiple Choice

DEA-C01 Data Store Management Practice Question

A financial services company stores transaction records in an Amazon DynamoDB table. An audit requires that all data older than 7 years be automatically and permanently deleted. The data engineering team must implement this with minimal operational overhead and no application code changes. What should the team do?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is assuming that DynamoDB Streams or point-in-time recovery can enforce time-based retention, when only TTL provides automatic, attribute-driven item expiration.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Configure a TTL attribute on the table with an expiry timestamp set to 7 years from the transaction date.

DynamoDB TTL is the native, serverless mechanism for automatic item expiration. By storing an epoch timestamp attribute set to the transaction date plus seven years, DynamoDB deletes expired items in the background without consuming write capacity or requiring custom code. It directly satisfies the audit's permanent deletion requirement with minimal operational effort, unlike stream-based, step-function, or restore-based approaches.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    Configure a TTL attribute on the table with an expiry timestamp set to 7 years from the transaction date.

    Why this is correct

    DynamoDB Time to Live (TTL) lets you define an attribute holding an expiration timestamp; DynamoDB automatically deletes expired items at no extra cost, with no code or infrastructure to manage. Setting the attribute to transaction date plus 7 years satisfies the audit requirement and requires only a one-time schema and write-path change, not ongoing operations.

  • ✗

    Enable point-in-time recovery and restore the table to a point before the 7-year window, then delete the original table.

    Why it's wrong here

    Point-in-time recovery restores a table to any point within the last 35 days, so it cannot target data older than 7 years. Restoring and swapping tables would also cause application downtime and is not an automated retention mechanism. This option misunderstands the PITR retention window and the requirement.

  • ✗

    Create a scheduled Amazon EventBridge rule that invokes an AWS Step Functions state machine to scan and delete old items.

    Why it's wrong here

    This approach requires building and maintaining a state machine, scan logic, and error handling, which is significant operational overhead. Scans are also costly on large tables and can consume provisioned capacity. It does not use a native DynamoDB feature for expiration and violates the minimal-overhead requirement.

  • ✗

    Enable DynamoDB Streams and write an AWS Lambda function that deletes items older than 7 years.

    Why it's wrong here

    DynamoDB Streams captures item-level changes, not time-based expiry, and a Lambda consumer would need to scan the table periodically to find old items. This adds compute cost and custom code, and a full-table scan on a large table is inefficient. It does not meet the requirement for minimal operational overhead or no application changes.

Quick reference

Cloud Service Model Comparison

ModelYou ManageProvider ManagesExamples
IaaSOS, runtime, apps, dataHardware, hypervisor, networkingEC2, Azure VMs, GCP Compute Engine
PaaSApps and dataOS, runtime, middleware, hardwareElastic Beanstalk, Azure App Service
SaaSData and settings onlyEverything elseMicrosoft 365, Salesforce, Workday
FaaS / ServerlessFunction code onlyInfra, scaling, runtimeLambda, Azure Functions, Cloud Run
CaaSContainers and appsKubernetes, OS, hardwareEKS, AKS, GKE

About these practice questions

One of 1,321 original DEA-C01 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Amazon Web Services exam blueprint

This DEA-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DEA-C01 exam.