STP and Rapid PVST+ questions test your understanding of root bridge election, port roles, port states, and protection features. These appear in MCQ, multi-select, and drag-and-drop formats on the CCNA because STP behaviour is non-intuitive and frequently misunderstood.
Start Scenario PracticeA network engineer is troubleshooting an STP issue in a network that uses Rapid PVST+. The network has a root bridge (SW1) and a secondary root bridge (SW2). The engineer notices that after a link failure between SW1 and SW2, the network takes longer than expected to converge. The engineer checks the configuration and finds that SW2 has the 'spanning-tree uplinkfast' command enabled. The engineer also notices that SW2 has a lower priority than SW1. What is the most likely cause of the slow convergence?
Explanation: UplinkFast is a legacy STP feature that is incompatible with Rapid PVST+. When enabled on a switch running Rapid PVST+, it forces the switch to revert to 802.1D STP convergence behavior on the affected ports, disabling the rapid transition mechanisms (such as proposal/agreement and sync). This causes the network to take longer to converge after a link failure, as the switch falls back to the slower listening and learning states.
A network engineer is configuring a new switch that will be used as an access layer switch. The switch connects to two distribution switches via trunk links. The engineer wants to ensure that the access switch does not become the root bridge for any VLAN. The engineer also wants to provide redundancy so that if one uplink fails, the other uplink takes over quickly. The engineer is using Rapid PVST+. What configuration should the engineer apply on the access switch?
Explanation: Setting the spanning-tree priority to 61440 (which is 0xF000 in hex) makes the switch a very unlikely root bridge candidate. In Rapid PVST+, the bridge priority is a 4-bit value (0-15) multiplied by 4096, so 61440 corresponds to priority 15 — the highest possible value. This ensures the access switch will never become the root bridge for any VLAN, while Rapid PVST+ provides fast failover (sub-second convergence) via its alternate/backup port mechanism without needing UplinkFast.
A company has a campus network with two distribution switches (DSW1 and DSW2) connected via a Layer 2 trunk. Each distribution switch connects to two access switches. Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) is running with default settings. Recently, a network administrator added a new access switch (ASW3) and connected it to both distribution switches. After the connection, network performance degraded significantly, and users in VLAN 10 reported intermittent connectivity. The administrator checked the logs and saw multiple TCN notifications. What is the most likely cause of the issue?
Explanation: When ASW3 is connected to both DSW1 and DSW2 via Layer 2 trunk links, it creates a physical loop in the network. With default STP settings, the new switch will participate in the spanning tree algorithm, but the sudden addition of redundant links can cause a temporary loop or instability until STP converges. The multiple TCN (Topology Change Notification) messages indicate that the spanning tree topology is flapping, leading to MAC address table flushes and intermittent connectivity for VLAN 10 users. This is the classic symptom of a Layer 2 loop caused by redundant links without proper STP configuration or before convergence completes.
Drag and drop each STP timer on the left to its matching default value on the right.
Explanation: Hello timer defaults to 2 seconds; Forward delay defaults to 15 seconds; Max age defaults to 20 seconds.
Drag and drop each STP variant on the left to its matching IEEE standard on the right.
Explanation: STP is 802.1D; RSTP is 802.1w; MSTP is 802.1s; PVST+ is a Cisco proprietary extension of 802.1D.
+10 more scenario questions available
Practice all Spanning Tree Protocol ScenariosSTP and Rapid PVST+ questions test your understanding of root bridge election, port roles, port states, and protection features. These appear in MCQ, multi-select, and drag-and-drop formats on the CCNA because STP behaviour is non-intuitive and frequently misunderstood. These appear throughout the 350-401 and require you to apply your knowledge, not just recall facts.
Cisco doesn't publish an exact breakdown, but scenario-based questions (especially exhibit and command-output formats) make up a significant portion of the 350-401. Practicing each scenario type ensures you're ready for any format.
Yes. Courseiva provides free 350-401 scenario practice across all official exam domains. The platform includes scenario-based questions, command-output interpretation, topic-based practice, mock exams, and readiness tracking — no account required.
Launch a full Spanning Tree Protocol Scenarios session with instant scoring and detailed explanations.
Start Scenario Practice →