A company uses Azure Blob Storage to store archival backups of financial records. The company requires that the data is protected against a complete regional outage by replicating it to another Azure region. However, they do not need to access the replicated copy unless the primary region fails. The company wants to minimize storage costs while meeting this requirement. Which type of storage replication should the company configure?
GRS replicates data asynchronously to a paired secondary region. It provides protection against a complete regional outage without offering read access to the secondary copy, which keeps costs lower than RA-GRS. This meets the company's requirement.
Why this answer
Geo-redundant storage (GRS) replicates your data synchronously three times within the primary region using LRS, then asynchronously to a secondary region hundreds of miles away. This meets the requirement of protecting against a complete regional outage while minimizing costs, because the secondary copy is not accessible for reads unless Microsoft initiates a failover, and GRS is less expensive than RA-GRS which includes read-access to the secondary region.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often confuse GRS with RA-GRS, assuming that geo-replication automatically provides read access to the secondary copy, but RA-GRS is a separate, more expensive SKU that enables continuous read access, which is not required when you only need failover capability.
Why the other options are wrong
LRS only replicates data within a single datacenter in the primary region, so it does not protect against a complete regional outage, which is a key requirement in the question.
ZRS replicates data synchronously across three Azure availability zones within a single region, not across regions. It does not protect against a complete regional outage, which requires geo-replication to a secondary region.
RA-GRS provides read access to the secondary region, which is not required because the company only needs access during a primary region failure. This adds unnecessary cost compared to GRS.