Question 58 of 1,639
Respond to security incidentshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to create an automation rule in Microsoft Sentinel that triggers a Logic App playbook when an incident is created. This is correct because automation rules are the native mechanism in Sentinel for responding to incident creation, and they can invoke a playbook—built in Azure Logic Apps—to perform enrichment tasks. The playbook uses the Microsoft 365 Defender connector to run advanced hunting queries that pull parent process details, network connections, and file creation events from the same device within the last hour, then posts the results as a comment directly on the incident. On the SC-200 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the incident enrichment pipeline: automation rules trigger playbooks, not analytics rules or Power Automate. A common trap is confusing analytics rules with automation rules—remember, analytics rules generate incidents, while automation rules respond to them. Memory tip: think of automation rules as the “when” and playbooks as the “how” for adding context automatically.

SC-200 Respond to security incidents Practice Question

This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of respond to security incidents. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Your organization uses Microsoft Sentinel as its SIEM and Microsoft Defender XDR for endpoint protection. You have a custom analytics rule that triggers on suspicious PowerShell activity. The rule uses the following KQL query:

```kql DeviceProcessEvents | where Timestamp > ago(1h) | where FileName == "powershell.exe" | where ProcessCommandLine contains "-EncodedCommand" | where InitiatingProcessFileName != "explorer.exe" | project Timestamp, DeviceName, AccountName, ProcessCommandLine ```

The rule generates incidents that are assigned to the SOC team for investigation. However, analysts report that they are spending too much time manually collecting additional process details for each alert. You need to automate the enrichment of these incidents with additional context, such as parent process details, network connections, and file creation events from the same device within the last hour. The enrichment should be triggered automatically when an incident is created, and the results should be added as a comment to the incident. You have access to Azure Logic Apps and Azure Automation. Which approach should you use?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Create an automation rule in Microsoft Sentinel that triggers a Logic App playbook when an incident is created. The playbook uses the Microsoft 365 Defender connector to run advanced hunting queries for parent process, network connections, and file creation events from the same device in the last hour, then adds the results as a comment to the incident.

Option A is correct because an automation rule can trigger a playbook (Logic App) when an incident is created. The Logic App can use the advanced hunting connector to query Defender XDR for additional context and add a comment. Option B is wrong because watchlists are for static data, not dynamic queries. Option C is wrong because analytics rules do not trigger playbooks; automation rules do. Option D is wrong because power automate is not integrated in Sentinel.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Create a second analytics rule that triggers on the same events and sends the additional context to a watchlist, then use a playbook to read the watchlist and add comments.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is overly complex and not efficient; automation rules with playbooks are the recommended approach.

  • Create an automation rule in Microsoft Sentinel that triggers a Logic App playbook when an incident is created. The playbook uses the Microsoft 365 Defender connector to run advanced hunting queries for parent process, network connections, and file creation events from the same device in the last hour, then adds the results as a comment to the incident.

    Why this is correct

    Automation rules can trigger playbooks on incident creation; Logic App can perform queries and add comments.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Use Microsoft Power Automate to create a flow that is triggered when a new incident appears in Sentinel, then use the flow to query Defender XDR and update the incident.

    Why it's wrong here

    Power Automate is not the native integration for Sentinel; Logic Apps is the recommended tool.

  • Modify the analytics rule query to join with additional tables to include parent process details, network connections, and file creation events directly in the alert.

    Why it's wrong here

    The analytics rule query is limited to what can be collected in a single query; joining too many tables may impact performance and is not the designed enrichment method.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related SC-200 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-200 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-200 question test?

Respond to security incidents — This question tests Respond to security incidents — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Create an automation rule in Microsoft Sentinel that triggers a Logic App playbook when an incident is created. The playbook uses the Microsoft 365 Defender connector to run advanced hunting queries for parent process, network connections, and file creation events from the same device in the last hour, then adds the results as a comment to the incident. — Option A is correct because an automation rule can trigger a playbook (Logic App) when an incident is created. The Logic App can use the advanced hunting connector to query Defender XDR for additional context and add a comment. Option B is wrong because watchlists are for static data, not dynamic queries. Option C is wrong because analytics rules do not trigger playbooks; automation rules do. Option D is wrong because power automate is not integrated in Sentinel.

What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?

Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.