Courseiva
Security Principles →hardMultiple Choice

ISC2 CC Security Principles Practice Question

A security consultant is evaluating a vendor's security practices before signing a contract. The consultant reviews the vendor's security policies, incident response plans, and conducts background checks on key personnel. This activity is an example of:

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Due diligence

Due diligence involves investigating and verifying security practices before making a decision, such as vendor risk assessment.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Risk avoidance

    Why it's wrong here

    Risk avoidance means eliminating the exposure entirely, for example declining the contract or refusing to share data with the vendor. The consultant instead proceeds while gathering evidence about the vendor's controls, so the risk remains and is being assessed. Avoidance would be the answer had the organisation cancelled the engagement.

  • ✗

    Due care

    Why it's wrong here

    Due care is the ongoing exercise of reasonable prudence, not a one-off pre-contract audit. Reviewing policies, incident plans and personnel checks before signing is due diligence: investigating and verifying a counterparty's claims. Due care would apply after signing, when the vendor must actually operate those controls day to day.

  • ✓

    Due diligence

    Why this is correct

    Due diligence is the pre-contract investigation of a vendor's controls, plans and personnel, gathering evidence before commitment. Audits and penetration tests examine an existing relationship, whereas due diligence satisfies the consultant's need to assess risk prior to signing.

  • ✗

    Risk mitigation

    Why it's wrong here

    Risk mitigation reduces an identified risk through controls, such as imposing contractual penalties or encryption. Here nothing has yet been changed or reduced; the consultant is only gathering information to inform a later decision. Mitigation would be correct once controls are actually applied to lower the vendor risk.

About these practice questions

One of 989 original CC practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.