- A
Need-to-know
Why wrong: Need-to-know restricts data access, not task division.
- B
Separation of duties
Separation of duties requires multiple people to complete a sensitive task.
- C
Least privilege
Why wrong: Least privilege is about minimal permissions, not splitting tasks.
- D
Job rotation
Why wrong: Job rotation moves people through roles over time.
Quick Answer
The answer is separation of duties, as requiring two different people to initiate and approve a financial transaction is a textbook example of this access control concept. Separation of duties works by dividing a critical process into distinct steps performed by separate individuals, ensuring that no single person has unchecked control over a sensitive operation. This directly mitigates the risk of fraud, error, or abuse by enforcing checks and balances. On the ISC2 Certified in Cybersecurity CC exam, this scenario tests your understanding of how access control principles are applied in real-world policies; a common trap is confusing it with dual control or least privilege, but remember that separation of duties focuses on splitting responsibilities, not just requiring multiple approvals. For a quick memory tip, think “two hands on the same task, but never the same person”—if one employee can both start and finish a transaction, it’s not separation of duties.
ISC2 CC Access Controls Concepts Practice Question
This CC practice question tests your understanding of access controls concepts. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A company implements a policy where a financial transaction must be initiated by one employee and approved by a different employee. This is an example of which access control concept?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Separation of duties
Separation of duties (SoD) is an access control concept that requires a critical task, such as a financial transaction, to be split into multiple steps performed by different individuals. This prevents any single employee from having the authority to both initiate and approve a transaction, thereby reducing the risk of fraud or error. In this scenario, the policy directly enforces SoD by ensuring that no one person can complete the entire process alone.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Need-to-know
Why it's wrong here
Need-to-know restricts data access, not task division.
- ✓
Separation of duties
Why this is correct
Separation of duties requires multiple people to complete a sensitive task.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Least privilege
Why it's wrong here
Least privilege is about minimal permissions, not splitting tasks.
- ✗
Job rotation
Why it's wrong here
Job rotation moves people through roles over time.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
ISC2 often tests candidates by confusing separation of duties with least privilege, as both involve limiting user actions, but the key distinction is that separation of duties requires multiple people to complete a task, while least privilege only limits the permissions of a single user.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Separation of duties is often implemented through dual-control mechanisms, such as requiring two different users to enter separate parts of a cryptographic key or to authorize a wire transfer in a financial system. Under the hood, this concept maps to the principle of 'two-person integrity' (2PI) in security models, where a single user cannot bypass the control even with elevated privileges. In real-world scenarios, a bank might require a teller to initiate a large transfer and a manager to approve it, with the system logging both actions and rejecting any attempt by the same user to perform both steps.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Access Controls Concepts — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Access Controls Concepts practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All CC questions
500 questions across all exam domains
- →
ISC2 Certified in Cybersecurity CC study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
CC practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related CC practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Access Controls Concepts practice questions
Practise CC questions linked to Access Controls Concepts.
Business Continuity, DR & Incident Response practice questions
Practise CC questions linked to Business Continuity, DR & Incident Response.
Security Principles practice questions
Practise CC questions linked to Security Principles.
Network Security practice questions
Practise CC questions linked to Network Security.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise CC questions linked to Security Operations.
CC fundamentals practice questions
Practise CC questions linked to CC fundamentals.
CC scenario practice questions
Practise CC questions linked to CC scenario.
CC troubleshooting practice questions
Practise CC questions linked to CC troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free CC practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this CC question test?
Access Controls Concepts — This question tests Access Controls Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Separation of duties — Separation of duties (SoD) is an access control concept that requires a critical task, such as a financial transaction, to be split into multiple steps performed by different individuals. This prevents any single employee from having the authority to both initiate and approve a transaction, thereby reducing the risk of fraud or error. In this scenario, the policy directly enforces SoD by ensuring that no one person can complete the entire process alone.
What should I do if I get this CC question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more ways this is tested on CC
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. An organization wants to ensure that no single employee can both request and approve a payment. Which access control principle does this enforce?
easy- ✓ A.Separation of duties
- B.Least privilege
- C.Need to know
- D.Defense in depth
Why A: Separation of duties (SoD) is the access control principle that prevents a single individual from having conflicting permissions, such as both requesting and approving a payment. By splitting the payment lifecycle into distinct roles (e.g., requester vs. approver), the organization enforces a dual-control mechanism that reduces the risk of fraud or error. This is commonly implemented in financial systems using role-based access control (RBAC) where the 'payment request' and 'payment approval' roles are mutually exclusive.
Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026
This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.