CRISC IT Risk Identification Practice Question
An organization is developing an IT risk universe. Which of the following is the PRIMARY purpose of creating a comprehensive IT risk universe?
⚠ Common exam trap
CRISC often tests the sequence of risk management activities — candidates confuse the purpose of the risk universe (completeness of identification) with downstream activities like prioritization, ownership assignment, or exposure aggregation.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
To ensure all potential IT risks are considered and documented
The IT risk universe is a comprehensive inventory of all plausible IT-related risks an organization faces, organized by category (e.g., infrastructure, applications, data, third parties, people). Its primary purpose is to ensure completeness — that all potential IT risks are considered and documented — so that subsequent risk assessment, prioritization, and treatment are built on a complete foundation. Without completeness, later steps may overlook material risks.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
To ensure all potential IT risks are considered and documented
Why this is correct
A comprehensive IT risk universe ensures no material risk is omitted from scoping, so every potential IT risk is identified and documented before assessment. This completeness underpins later risk evaluation, appetite setting and treatment, preventing blind spots that would otherwise distort the organisation's overall IT risk profile.
- ✗
To prioritize risks based on their financial impact
Why it's wrong here
Prioritising by financial impact is a subsequent risk-analysis step, not the universe's purpose. The universe establishes complete coverage of IT risk sources across the organisation so that no exposure is overlooked before any ranking occurs. It tempts because prioritisation drives treatment decisions, yet it requires the enumerated universe as its input.
- ✗
To assign risk owners to each identified risk
Why it's wrong here
Assigning owners happens after risks are identified and assessed, so it cannot be the universe's primary purpose. The universe provides the complete inventory of IT risk sources from which ownership can later be allocated. It tempts because accountability is a governance requirement, but it depends on the universe existing first.
- ✗
To calculate the aggregated risk exposure for the organization
Why it's wrong here
Aggregating exposure is a later risk-assessment output, not the universe's purpose. The universe exists to inventory and structure all IT risk sources so nothing is omitted from scope; aggregation presupposes that inventory already exists. It tempts because quantification follows enumeration, but the stem asks for the primary purpose of building the universe itself.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 1,062 original CRISC practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official ISACA exam blueprint
This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.