You are deploying a new version of a model to a Vertex AI endpoint that already has a champion model serving 100% of traffic. You want to gradually shift traffic to the new version while monitoring for errors. Which approach should you use?
Trap 1: Use Cloud Load Balancing with weighted backend services pointing to…
Cloud Load Balancing distributes traffic across backends but cannot perform Vertex AI traffic splitting, model versioning or prediction monitoring. It is tempting because weighted backends resemble gradual rollout, yet it would be correct only for routing generic HTTP traffic across separate services, not shifting traffic between models on one endpoint.
Trap 2: Delete the champion model and redeploy with the challenger as the…
Deleting the champion removes the serving version entirely, so no gradual traffic shift or error monitoring against the incumbent is possible. It is tempting because redeploying the challenger appears to complete the rollout, but it would be correct only when a full cutover with no rollback or comparison is acceptable.
Trap 3: Create a new endpoint for the challenger and use a load balancer to…
Vertex AI endpoints already support traffic splitting natively, so introducing a separate endpoint plus an external load balancer breaks the managed routing, monitoring and model registry integration the platform provides. A distinct endpoint is intended for isolating a model with its own access, quota or deployment lifecycle — not for canary percentages, which are configured directly on the existing endpoint's deployed model split.
- A
Use Cloud Load Balancing with weighted backend services pointing to different endpoints.
Why it fails: Cloud Load Balancing distributes traffic across backends but cannot perform Vertex AI traffic splitting, model versioning or prediction monitoring. It is tempting because weighted backends resemble gradual rollout, yet it would be correct only for routing generic HTTP traffic across separate services, not shifting traffic between models on one endpoint.
- B
Deploy the challenger to the same endpoint with initial traffic split, e.g., champion 90%, challenger 10%, and gradually adjust.
Deploying the challenger alongside the champion on one endpoint enables Vertex AI traffic splitting, so a small percentage of requests reach the new model while the champion serves the rest, allowing gradual, reversible rollout with error monitoring before full cutover.
- C
Delete the champion model and redeploy with the challenger as the new version.
Why it fails: Deleting the champion removes the serving version entirely, so no gradual traffic shift or error monitoring against the incumbent is possible. It is tempting because redeploying the challenger appears to complete the rollout, but it would be correct only when a full cutover with no rollback or comparison is acceptable.
- D
Create a new endpoint for the challenger and use a load balancer to split traffic.
Why it fails: Vertex AI endpoints already support traffic splitting natively, so introducing a separate endpoint plus an external load balancer breaks the managed routing, monitoring and model registry integration the platform provides. A distinct endpoint is intended for isolating a model with its own access, quota or deployment lifecycle — not for canary percentages, which are configured directly on the existing endpoint's deployed model split.