Courseiva
Vulnerability Management →mediumMultiple Choice

CS0-003 Vulnerability Management Practice Question

A security analyst is prioritizing vulnerabilities for remediation. One vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 score of 7.5, an EPSS score of 0.02, and is not in the CISA KEV catalog. Another vulnerability has a CVSS score of 5.0, an EPSS score of 0.85, and is listed in the KEV catalog. Which vulnerability should be prioritized FIRST?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

The vulnerability with CVSS 5.0

EPSS and KEV catalog provide real-world exploit intelligence. The vulnerability with high EPSS and KEV is more likely to be exploited, so it should be prioritized despite lower CVSS.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    The vulnerability with CVSS 7.5

    Why it's wrong here

    While a CVSS score of 7.5 indicates a high theoretical severity, prioritizing it solely based on this metric ignores real-world threat intelligence. Without active exploits or known threat actor activity, a higher CVSS vulnerability poses less immediate risk than a lower-severity vulnerability that is currently being actively exploited in the wild.

  • ✗

    Both should be prioritized equally

    Why it's wrong here

    Treating both vulnerabilities with equal urgency is an inefficient use of limited remediation resources. The vulnerability with a CVSS score of 5.0 has a significantly higher probability of exploitation due to its presence in the KEV catalog and its high EPSS score. Consequently, it must be addressed first to mitigate immediate, active threats to the organization.

  • ✗

    Neither should be prioritized until a full risk assessment is done

    Why it's wrong here

    Delaying remediation to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment introduces an unnecessary window of exposure and increases organizational risk. Threat intelligence feeds like CISA's KEV and EPSS provide immediate, actionable data that allows analysts to bypass lengthy assessments and rapidly mitigate active, high-probability threats.

  • ✓

    The vulnerability with CVSS 5.0

    Why this is correct

    The vulnerability with a CVSS score of 5.0 should be prioritized because its high EPSS score and inclusion in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog indicate active, real-world exploitation. Remediation efforts must focus on vulnerabilities with proven threat actor activity, as they represent an immediate entry point, regardless of a moderate base severity score.

About these practice questions

This CS0-004 question is part of Courseiva's 701-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CS0-004 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CS0-004 exam.